ranch: be large

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.57
, horse
Weight: 0.57
, farm
Weight: 0.55
Siblings matador
Weight: 0.40
, mustang
Weight: 0.33
, campsite
Weight: 0.33
, vineyard
Weight: 0.32
, campground
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be large 1.00
has very large eye 0.80
be at large rectanguloid western state 0.79
be big 0.78
has big schlongs 0.77
be very big 0.77
be more attractive when they be small 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(horse, has very large eye)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ranch, be large)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(horse, be very big)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ranch, be large)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ranch, be large)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(horse, be big)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ranch, be large)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(horse, be big)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(horse, has very large eye)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(horse, be very big)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(horse, has very large eye)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(horse, be very big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(horse, has very large eye)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ranch, be large)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(horse, be big)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ranch, be large)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(horse, be very big)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ranch, be large)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ranch, be large)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ranch, be large)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ranch, be at large rectanguloid western state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be at large rectanguloid western state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(ranch, be at large rectanguloid western state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ranch, be at large rectanguloid western state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be large)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ranch, be large)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(horse, be very big)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(horse, has very large eye)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(horse, be big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(horse, has very large eye)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(horse, be very big)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(ranch, be large)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(horse, be big)