rank: be in military

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, privilege
Weight: 0.55
, service
Weight: 0.52
, man
Weight: 0.52
Siblings ensign
Weight: 0.54
, attribute
Weight: 0.32
, status
Weight: 0.31
, level
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in military 1.00
be important to military 0.96
be in army 0.85
be in army work 0.84
be important in army 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, be in military)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rank, be in military)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(man, be in military)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(man, be in military)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(man, be in military)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(rank, be in military)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(rank, be in military)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rank, be important to military)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rank, be in army)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(rank, be important to military)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rank, be in army work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rank, be important in army)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rank, be in army)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rank, be important to military)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(rank, be in army)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(rank, be in army work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(rank, be important in army)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(rank, be in army)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rank, be in army work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rank, be important to military)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rank, be in army work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rank, be important in army)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(rank, be important in army)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rank, be in military)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rank, be in military)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, be in military)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rank, be in military)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(man, be in military)