rap: have negative impact

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents style
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, form
Weight: 0.54
, influence
Weight: 0.53
, music
Weight: 0.51
Siblings rap music
Weight: 0.37
, rock music
Weight: 0.34
, punk rock
Weight: 0.34
, pop music
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have negative impact 1.00
have impact 0.93
have negative impact on youth 0.92
have impact on youth 0.81
is bad influence 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(rap music, have negative impact on youth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rap music, have negative impact)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rap music, is bad influence)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rap music, have impact on youth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(rap music, have impact)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(rap music, have impact)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(rap music, have impact)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rap music, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rap music, have negative impact)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rap music, have impact on youth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rap music, have impact on youth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(rap music, have negative impact on youth)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(rap music, have negative impact on youth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(rap music, is bad influence)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rap music, is bad influence)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(rap, have negative impact)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(rap, have impact)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact on youth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(rap, have impact)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(rap, have impact)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rap, have impact)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rap, is bad influence)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(rap, have impact on youth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rap, have negative impact on youth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rap, have negative impact on youth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(rap, is bad influence)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(rap, have impact on youth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rap, is bad influence)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rap, have impact on youth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rap, have impact on youth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rap, have negative impact on youth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rap, is bad influence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rap, have negative impact)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rap music, have impact)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rap music, have negative impact)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rap music, have negative impact on youth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rap music, have impact on youth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rap, have negative impact)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rap music, is bad influence)