rate: be low at night

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents interest rate
Weight: 0.91
, tax
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
Siblings inflation
Weight: 0.68
, cent
Weight: 0.60
, maximum
Weight: 0.55
, initial interest rate
Weight: 0.36
, income tax
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low at night 1.00
is high 0.80
be higher on bright day 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(interest rate, is high)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rate, be low at night)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(interest rate, is high)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, is high)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(inflation, is high)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is high)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(interest rate, is high)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(rate, be low at night)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(income tax, is high)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, is high)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(inflation, is high)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inflation, is high)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rate, be low at night)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rate, is high)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rate, be higher on bright day)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rate, is high)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(rate, is high)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rate, be higher on bright day)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rate, be higher on bright day)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(rate, be higher on bright day)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(rate, is high)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rate, be low at night)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rate, be low at night)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(interest rate, is high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(income tax, is high)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(inflation, is high)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(rate, be low at night)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(interest rate, is high)