income tax: is high

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is high 1.00
is basketball low 0.77
be high in quebec 0.76
was high during great depression 0.76
is stubbornly high 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is high)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(income tax, is high)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is high)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(income tax, is high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(unemployment, is high)