unemployment: is high

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is high 1.00
be low in 2018 0.88
be high in states 0.83
be high in countries 0.81
is low right now 0.80
be low in us 0.79
has degree low 0.79
be high in quebec 0.76
is stubbornly high 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(income, has degree low) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(unemployment, is high)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be high in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(unemployment, is high)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(income, be high in countries)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(income, has degree low)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income, be high in countries)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(income, has degree low)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is high)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(income, has degree low) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is high)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be high in countries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is high)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(income tax, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, is high)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(unemployment, is high)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is low right now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(unemployment, is low right now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is low right now)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(unemployment, has degree low)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(unemployment, has degree low)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, has degree low)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(unemployment, is low right now)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(unemployment, has degree low)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(unemployment, be low in us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(unemployment, be low in us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be low in us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(unemployment, is high)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(income, be high in countries)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(income, has degree low)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(income tax, is high)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(income, be high in countries)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(unemployment, is high) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(income, has degree low)