unemployment: be low in us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.66
, indicator
Weight: 0.66
, spending
Weight: 0.64
, benefit
Weight: 0.63
, situation
Weight: 0.63
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.35
, poverty
Weight: 0.34
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, unearned income
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be low in us 1.00
be low in 2018 0.89
be in us 0.88
is low right now 0.85
affect us 0.81
be problem in us 0.80
is high 0.79
be low in china 0.77
be high in countries 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be high in countries)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(unemployment, be low in us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(income, be high in countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income, be high in countries)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is high)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(income, be high in countries)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be low in us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(income tax, is high)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(income tax, is high)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(unemployment, be low in us)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is low right now)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is low right now)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(unemployment, is low right now)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(unemployment, be low in china)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(unemployment, be low in china)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(unemployment, is high)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, is high)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(unemployment, is high)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(unemployment, is low right now)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(unemployment, be low in china)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(unemployment, is high)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(unemployment, be low in us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(income, be high in countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(income tax, is high)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(unemployment, be low in us)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(income, be high in countries)