ratio: analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
analysis 1.00
be important in analysis 0.96
be used in analysis 0.96
is used in analysis 0.96
be important in financial analysis 0.89
be used in financial analysis 0.89
is used in financial analysis 0.88
be helpful in statement analysis 0.84
be helpful in financial statement analysis 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(factor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ratio, analysis)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(factor, analysis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(factor, analysis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(factor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ratio, analysis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(ratio, analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in financial analysis)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ratio, is used in financial analysis)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be helpful in financial statement analysis)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ratio, be used in financial analysis)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ratio, is used in financial analysis)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ratio, be important in financial analysis)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ratio, be helpful in financial statement analysis)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ratio, be used in financial analysis)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ratio, is used in financial analysis)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ratio, be helpful in financial statement analysis)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be used in financial analysis)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, is used in financial analysis)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be helpful in financial statement analysis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ratio, analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ratio, analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(factor, analysis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ratio, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(factor, analysis)