ratio: be important in financial analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in financial analysis 1.00
be used in financial analysis 0.98
is used in financial analysis 0.98
be important in analysis 0.92
be helpful in financial statement analysis 0.92
analysis 0.89
be used in analysis 0.88
is used in analysis 0.88
be helpful in statement analysis 0.84
be important in financial decision making 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(factor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(factor, analysis)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(factor, analysis)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(factor, analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(ratio, be important in financial analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be used in financial analysis)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, is used in financial analysis)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ratio, be used in financial analysis)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ratio, is used in financial analysis)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ratio, be used in financial analysis)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(ratio, is used in financial analysis)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be helpful in financial statement analysis)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ratio, be helpful in financial statement analysis)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ratio, analysis)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(ratio, analysis)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ratio, be helpful in financial statement analysis)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(ratio, analysis)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in financial decision making)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ratio, be important in financial decision making)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ratio, be important in financial decision making)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in financial analysis)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ratio, is used in financial analysis)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be helpful in financial statement analysis)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial decision making)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ratio, analysis)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(factor, analysis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(ratio, be important in financial analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(factor, analysis)