ratio: be used in architecture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, parameter
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden ratio
Weight: 0.72
, roe
Weight: 0.52
, peg
Weight: 0.45
, interest rate
Weight: 0.34
, rate
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in architecture 1.00
be important in design 0.82
be used in art 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be used in architecture)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in design)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(golden ratio, be used in art)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(golden ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be used in architecture)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(golden ratio, be important in design)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be important in design)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(golden ratio, be used in art)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(golden ratio, be used in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ratio, be used in architecture)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ratio, be important in design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(ratio, be important in design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ratio, be used in art)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ratio, be important in design)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ratio, be used in art)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ratio, be used in art)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be important in design)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in art)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ratio, be used in architecture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be used in architecture)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be used in art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ratio, be used in architecture)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(golden ratio, be important in design)