razor blade: is dang expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blade
Weight: 0.74
, utensil
Weight: 0.70
, weapon
Weight: 0.70
, instrument
Weight: 0.69
Siblings razor
Weight: 0.39
, knife
Weight: 0.36
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.36
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.36
, scissors
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dang expensive 1.00
have most of time crap 0.78
is expensive 0.78
is expensive now 0.77
is expensive yahoo 0.77
be in fucking game 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(utensil, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(blade, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(blade, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(utensil, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(instrument, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(utensil, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blade, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(razor, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(razor, be in fucking game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pocket knife, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(knife, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(utensil, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(blade, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(instrument, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(knife, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(knife, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(pocket knife, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(pocket knife, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(razor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(razor, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(razor, be in fucking game)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(razor, be in fucking game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(razor blade, is dang expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(razor blade, is expensive yahoo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(razor blade, is expensive yahoo)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(razor blade, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(razor blade, is expensive now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(razor blade, is expensive yahoo)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is expensive yahoo)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(razor blade, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(razor blade, is expensive now)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(razor blade, is expensive now)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(razor blade, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is expensive now)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(blade, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(utensil, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(knife, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(pocket knife, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(razor, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(razor, be in fucking game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(blade, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(instrument, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(razor blade, is dang expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(utensil, is expensive)