rbc: be count in more infants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blood cell
Weight: 0.49
, cell
Weight: 0.47
, financial institution
Weight: 0.47
, company
Weight: 0.43
, organization
Weight: 0.41
Siblings red blood cell
Weight: 0.28
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.27
, sperm cell
Weight: 0.27
, stem cell
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be count in more infants 1.00
be count in infants 0.99
be count in less females 0.85
be count in females 0.84
be more count 0.82
be low count 0.76
be high count 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(white blood cell, be high count)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(white blood cell, be high count)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(white blood cell, be high count)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in more infants)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in infants)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in infants)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rbc, be count in infants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in less females)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in less females)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in infants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be more count)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rbc, be count in less females)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rbc, be more count)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(rbc, be more count)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in females)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in less females)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rbc, be more count)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be low count)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in females)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be high count)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rbc, be low count)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(rbc, be low count)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rbc, be high count)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rbc, be low count)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rbc, be high count)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rbc, be high count)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in more infants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(white blood cell, be high count)