rbc: be count in females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blood cell
Weight: 0.49
, cell
Weight: 0.47
, financial institution
Weight: 0.47
, company
Weight: 0.43
, organization
Weight: 0.41
Siblings red blood cell
Weight: 0.28
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.27
, sperm cell
Weight: 0.27
, stem cell
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be count in females 1.00
be count in less females 0.97
be more count 0.87
be different in females 0.86
be high count 0.84
be count in more infants 0.84
be low count 0.83
be different in males 0.83
be count in infants 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(white blood cell, be high count)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(white blood cell, be high count)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(white blood cell, be high count)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in females)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in less females)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in less females)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rbc, be count in less females)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in less females)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(rbc, be count in more infants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in more infants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in more infants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(rbc, be count in infants)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in infants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in infants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be more count)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rbc, be more count)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(rbc, be more count)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in more infants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rbc, be more count)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in infants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rbc, be different in females)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be different in females)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rbc, be low count)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rbc, be different in males)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be low count)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rbc, be high count)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rbc, be different in females)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rbc, be different in females)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be different in males)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rbc, be low count)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be high count)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(rbc, be different in males)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(rbc, be low count)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(rbc, be high count)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(rbc, be different in males)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(rbc, be high count)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(white blood cell, be high count)