rbc: be different in females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blood cell
Weight: 0.49
, cell
Weight: 0.47
, financial institution
Weight: 0.47
, company
Weight: 0.43
, organization
Weight: 0.41
Siblings red blood cell
Weight: 0.28
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.27
, sperm cell
Weight: 0.27
, stem cell
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different in females 1.00
be different in males 0.95
be count in females 0.86
be count in less females 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(rbc, be different in females)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in less females)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(rbc, be count in less females)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in less females)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rbc, be different in males)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in less females)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be count in females)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(rbc, be count in females)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rbc, be count in females)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rbc, be count in females)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(rbc, be different in males)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be different in males)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(rbc, be different in males)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(rbc, be different in females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(rbc, be different in females)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rbc, be different in females)