rbc: is good bank

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blood cell
Weight: 0.49
, cell
Weight: 0.47
, financial institution
Weight: 0.47
, company
Weight: 0.43
, organization
Weight: 0.41
Siblings red blood cell
Weight: 0.28
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.27
, sperm cell
Weight: 0.27
, stem cell
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good bank 1.00
is bank 0.96
is best bank 0.95
is banking 0.83
is banking down 0.82
is online banking down 0.79
is online banking 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rbc, is good bank)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rbc, is bank)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(rbc, is bank)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is bank)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rbc, is bank)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is best bank)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rbc, is banking down)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(rbc, is banking down)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is banking down)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rbc, is online banking down)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(rbc, is online banking down)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is online banking down)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rbc, is online banking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is online banking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(rbc, is online banking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(rbc, is best bank)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(rbc, is banking down)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rbc, is banking)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rbc, is banking)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is banking)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rbc, is online banking down)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(rbc, is online banking)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(rbc, is best bank)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rbc, is best bank)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(rbc, is banking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is good bank)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(rbc, is good bank) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rbc, is good bank)