rbc: is online banking down

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blood cell
Weight: 0.49
, cell
Weight: 0.47
, financial institution
Weight: 0.47
, company
Weight: 0.43
, organization
Weight: 0.41
Siblings red blood cell
Weight: 0.28
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.27
, sperm cell
Weight: 0.27
, stem cell
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
is online banking down 1.00
is online banking 0.97
is banking down 0.95
is banking 0.91
is bank 0.80
is good bank 0.79
is best bank 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(rbc, is online banking down)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is online banking)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rbc, is online banking)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(rbc, is online banking)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(rbc, is banking down)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(rbc, is banking down)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is banking down)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(rbc, is online banking)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is banking)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rbc, is banking)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(rbc, is bank)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is bank)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(rbc, is bank)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(rbc, is banking down)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rbc, is banking)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is good bank)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rbc, is bank)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is best bank)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rbc, is good bank)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(rbc, is banking)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(rbc, is best bank)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(rbc, is good bank)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(rbc, is best bank)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(rbc, is good bank)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(rbc, is best bank)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rbc, is online banking down)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(rbc, is online banking down)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(rbc, is online banking down)