realtor: have pictures

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents professional
Weight: 0.64
, business people
Weight: 0.60
, website
Weight: 0.59
, site
Weight: 0.57
, customer
Weight: 0.56
Siblings appraiser
Weight: 0.34
, real estate agent
Weight: 0.34
, notary
Weight: 0.33
, banker
Weight: 0.33
, accountant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have pictures 1.00
take pictures 0.95
take bad pictures 0.91
have pictures on business cards 0.87
cross in photos 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(appraiser, take pictures)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(appraiser, take pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(appraiser, take pictures)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(realtor, have pictures)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(realtor, take pictures)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(realtor, take bad pictures)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(realtor, take pictures)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(realtor, take bad pictures)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have pictures on business cards)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(realtor, cross in photos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(realtor, take pictures)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(realtor, cross in photos)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(realtor, have pictures on business cards)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(realtor, take bad pictures)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(realtor, take pictures)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(realtor, cross in photos)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(realtor, take bad pictures)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(realtor, have pictures on business cards)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(realtor, cross in photos)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(realtor, have pictures on business cards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have pictures)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(realtor, have pictures)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(appraiser, take pictures)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(realtor, have pictures) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(real estate agent, have pictures on business cards)