recession: increase size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.57
, correction
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, force
Weight: 0.56
Siblings great depression
Weight: 0.71
, slump
Weight: 0.42
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, cold war
Weight: 0.32
, pandemic
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase size 1.00
increase with size 0.99
decrease as increase in size 0.95
has size small 0.86
was increase 0.85
decrease as increase 0.85
increase with molecular size 0.84
decrease as distance increases 0.82
increase size of budget deficit 0.80
increase tax 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(force, decrease as increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(recession, increase size)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(force, decrease as increase in size)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(force, decrease as increase in size)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(force, decrease as increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(recession, increase size)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(recession, increase size)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(recession, increase size of budget deficit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(recession, increase size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(force, decrease as increase in size)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(recession, increase size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(force, decrease as increase in size)