recession: increase size of budget deficit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents challenge
Weight: 0.57
, correction
Weight: 0.57
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, force
Weight: 0.56
Siblings great depression
Weight: 0.71
, slump
Weight: 0.42
, economy
Weight: 0.34
, cold war
Weight: 0.32
, pandemic
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase size of budget deficit 1.00
make deficit increase 0.95
cause trade deficit 0.87
increase size 0.80
increase with size 0.80
spending money 0.77
increase tax 0.77
decrease as increase in size 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(force, decrease as increase in size)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(recession, increase size of budget deficit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(force, decrease as increase in size)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(force, decrease as increase in size)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(economy, spending money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(force, decrease as increase in size)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(recession, increase size of budget deficit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(economy, spending money)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(economy, spending money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(recession, increase size of budget deficit)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(recession, make deficit increase)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(recession, make deficit increase)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recession, make deficit increase)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(recession, make deficit increase)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(recession, increase size)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(recession, increase size)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(recession, increase size)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(recession, cause trade deficit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(recession, cause trade deficit)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(recession, cause trade deficit)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(recession, cause trade deficit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(recession, increase size of budget deficit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(force, decrease as increase in size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(economy, spending money)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(recession, increase size of budget deficit)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(force, decrease as increase in size)