recruiter: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings staff sergeant
Weight: 0.51
, salesperson
Weight: 0.33
, counselor
Weight: 0.33
, family member
Weight: 0.33
, representative
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is pay 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(counselor, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(counselor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(counselor, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(salesperson, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(salesperson, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(recruiter, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(recruiter, is pay)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(recruiter, is pay)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(recruiter, is pay)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, is pay)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(recruiter, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(counselor, get paid)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(salesperson, get paid)