recruiter: is pay

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents member
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings staff sergeant
Weight: 0.51
, salesperson
Weight: 0.33
, counselor
Weight: 0.33
, family member
Weight: 0.33
, representative
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is pay 1.00
get paid 0.88
ask for salary 0.78
ask for current salary 0.78
ask for salary history 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(salesperson, get paid)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(counselor, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(counselor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(counselor, get paid)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(salesperson, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(salesperson, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(recruiter, is pay)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, get paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(recruiter, get paid)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, ask for current salary)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, ask for salary history)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, ask for salary)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(recruiter, ask for salary)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(recruiter, ask for salary history)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(recruiter, get paid)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(recruiter, ask for current salary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(recruiter, ask for salary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(recruiter, get paid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(recruiter, ask for current salary)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(recruiter, ask for salary)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(recruiter, ask for salary history)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(recruiter, ask for salary history)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(recruiter, ask for current salary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, is pay)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(recruiter, is pay)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(counselor, get paid)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(recruiter, is pay) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(salesperson, get paid)