red blood cell: be shaped as biconcave disk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blood cell
Weight: 0.91
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.82
, human cell
Weight: 0.78
, cell membrane
Weight: 0.75
, stem cell
Weight: 0.71
Siblings sperm cell
Weight: 0.40
, muscle cell
Weight: 0.40
, fat cell
Weight: 0.40
, cancer cell
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be shaped as biconcave disk 1.00
have shaped disc 0.87
is disc shape 0.78
be shaped with dimple 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(blood cell, have shaped disc)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blood cell, have shaped disc)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(blood cell, have shaped disc)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(blood cell, have shaped disc)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, is disc shape)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(red blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(red blood cell, is disc shape)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, is disc shape)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(red blood cell, is disc shape)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(red blood cell, have shaped disc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(blood cell, have shaped disc)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(blood cell, have shaped disc)