red blood cell: be shaped with dimple

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents blood cell
Weight: 0.91
, white blood cell
Weight: 0.82
, human cell
Weight: 0.78
, cell membrane
Weight: 0.75
, stem cell
Weight: 0.71
Siblings sperm cell
Weight: 0.40
, muscle cell
Weight: 0.40
, fat cell
Weight: 0.40
, cancer cell
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be shaped with dimple 1.00
have dimple 0.95
have dimples 0.83
is concave 0.81
have shaped disc 0.76
be shaped as biconcave disk 0.75
be sickle shaped in person 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(blood cell, is concave)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(blood cell, have shaped disc)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(blood cell, is concave)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(blood cell, is concave)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(blood cell, is concave)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(blood cell, have shaped disc)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, have dimple)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(red blood cell, have dimple)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, have dimples)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, have dimple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(red blood cell, have dimple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, is concave)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(red blood cell, is concave)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(red blood cell, have dimples)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, have dimples)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(red blood cell, have dimples)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, is concave)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(red blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red blood cell, be shaped as biconcave disk)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(red blood cell, is concave)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(red blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(red blood cell, have shaped disc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(blood cell, is concave)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(blood cell, is concave)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(blood cell, have shaped disc)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(red blood cell, be shaped with dimple)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(blood cell, be sickle shaped in person)