red fox: defend themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend themselves 1.00
protect themselves 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(arctic fox, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(red fox, defend themselves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, protect themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, protect themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, defend themselves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(red panda, protect themselves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(arctic fox, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(brown bear, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(brown bear, defend themselves)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(red panda, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red panda, protect themselves)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(brown bear, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(brown bear, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(red fox, defend themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(red fox, protect themselves)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red fox, protect themselves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(red fox, protect themselves)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, protect themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(red fox, defend themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(arctic fox, protect themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(red panda, defend themselves)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red panda, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(brown bear, defend themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(brown bear, protect themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(arctic fox, protect themselves)