red panda: defend themselves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend themselves 1.00
protect themselves 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(monkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(red panda, defend themselves)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(monkey, protect themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monkey, protect themselves)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, defend themselves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, protect themselves)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red fox, protect themselves)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(monkey, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(red fox, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red fox, defend themselves)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(red fox, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, protect themselves)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(komodo dragon, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, defend themselves)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(komodo dragon, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(red panda, defend themselves)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(red panda, protect themselves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(red panda, protect themselves)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red panda, protect themselves)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red panda, protect themselves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(red panda, defend themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(monkey, protect themselves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(red fox, protect themselves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, defend themselves)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(red fox, defend themselves)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, protect themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(red panda, defend themselves)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(monkey, protect themselves)