red fox: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red fox, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red squirrel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red fox, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(red fox, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(red fox, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(red fox, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red fox, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(red fox, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has quality bad)