red fox: has state care

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state care 1.00
be care of 0.92
be young care 0.85
be young care of 0.85
be taken care 0.83
be taken care of 0.83
be young taken care 0.81
be young taken care of 0.81
has state problem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red fox, has state care)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red fox, has state care)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, has state problem)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fox, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, has state problem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(red fox, has state care)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(red fox, has state care)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(red fox, has state care)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(red fox, be taken care)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(red fox, be care of)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, be taken care of)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(red fox, be care of)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(red fox, be taken care)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be young care of)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(red fox, be young care of)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, be taken care of)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(red fox, be care of)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(red fox, be young care of)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(red fox, be young care)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, be young care of)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(red fox, be young taken care of)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(red fox, be young taken care)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be young care)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(red fox, be taken care)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be young taken care of)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(red fox, be taken care of)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red fox, be young taken care of)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(red fox, be young taken care of)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(red fox, be young care)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(red fox, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(red fox, be young taken care)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(red fox, be young care)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be young taken care)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be care of)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(red fox, be young taken care)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(red fox, has state problem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(red fox, has state problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be taken care of)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be taken care)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state care)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red fox, has state care)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has state problem)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fox, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(red fox, has state care) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fox, has state problem)