red fox: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state care 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(red fox, has state problem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(red fox, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fox, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fox, has state problem)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, has state problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(red fox, has state problem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(red fox, has state problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(red fox, has state problem)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red fox, has state care)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(red fox, has state care)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(red fox, has state care)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state care)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(red fox, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has state problem)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fox, has state problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(red fox, has state problem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fox, has state problem)