red panda: be related to giant pandas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to giant pandas 1.00
be related to pandas 0.96
be called pandas 0.93
be called red pandas 0.92
be called lesser pandas 0.89
is panda 0.86
be called panda 0.86
be called red panda 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to giant pandas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called pandas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(red panda, be related to giant pandas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(red panda, be related to giant pandas)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red panda, be called pandas)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, be called red pandas)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(red panda, be called pandas)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red panda, be called red pandas)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to giant pandas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to giant pandas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called pandas)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(red panda, be related to giant pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called pandas)