red panda: is zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is zoo 1.00
be called pandas 0.76
is panda 0.76
be called panda 0.76
be related to pandas 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(giant panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(red panda, is zoo)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(red panda, is zoo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is zoo)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called pandas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, is zoo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is zoo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(giant panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red panda, is zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panda bear, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panda bear, is zoo)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(komodo dragon, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, is zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(red panda, is zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red panda, be called pandas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, is panda)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(red panda, be called panda)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(red panda, is panda)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called pandas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(red panda, is panda)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(red panda, be called pandas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called panda)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(red panda, be called panda)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called pandas)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is panda)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called panda)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(red panda, is zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(giant panda, is zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, is zoo)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(panda bear, is zoo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(giant panda, is zoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(red panda, is zoo)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called pandas)