red squirrel: decline in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, bird
Weight: 0.71
, mammal
Weight: 0.69
, rodent
Weight: 0.66
, animal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.40
, squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, blue bird
Weight: 0.39
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
decline in uk 1.00
be in decline 0.87
be endangered in uk 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, decline in uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blue bird, be in decline)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be endangered in uk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(squirrel, decline in uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blue bird, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(blue bird, be in decline)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(squirrel, be endangered in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be endangered in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(red squirrel, decline in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be in decline)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(red squirrel, be in decline)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, be in decline)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(red squirrel, be in decline)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(red squirrel, be endangered in uk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be endangered in uk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, be endangered in uk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(red squirrel, be endangered in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(red squirrel, decline in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(squirrel, decline in uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(blue bird, be in decline)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(squirrel, be endangered in uk)