redneck: have do

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents character
Weight: 0.51
, word
Weight: 0.50
, group
Weight: 0.49
, racist
Weight: 0.47
, poor people
Weight: 0.44
Siblings nigger
Weight: 0.32
, bigot
Weight: 0.32
, cowboy
Weight: 0.32
, moron
Weight: 0.31
, cunt
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have do 1.00
do things 0.90
be afraid of everything 0.80
is stupid ones again 0.80
is stupid ones 0.77
is ones again 0.77
see ufos 0.77
hate people 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(poor people, hate people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(redneck, have do)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(poor people, hate people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(poor people, hate people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(poor people, hate people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(redneck, have do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(redneck, have do)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(redneck, do things)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(redneck, do things)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(redneck, do things)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(redneck, be afraid of everything)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(redneck, be afraid of everything)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(redneck, have do)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(redneck, have do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(poor people, hate people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(redneck, have do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(poor people, hate people)