referee: be at football

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coach
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings soccer ball
Weight: 0.32
, captain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at football 1.00
be at soccer game 0.88
be at hockey game 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(coach, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(referee, be at football)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coach, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(referee, be at football)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(coach, be at soccer game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coach, be at hockey game)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(coach, be at soccer game)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(coach, be at hockey game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(coach, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(referee, be at football)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coach, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(referee, be at football)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, be at soccer game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, be at soccer game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(referee, be at football)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(referee, be at soccer game)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(referee, be at hockey game)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(referee, be at soccer game)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at soccer game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(referee, be at hockey game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(referee, be at soccer game)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(referee, be at hockey game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(referee, be at football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(coach, be at soccer game)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(coach, be at hockey game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer ball, be at soccer game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer ball, be at soccer game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(coach, be at soccer game)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(referee, be at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(coach, be at hockey game)