referee: be in football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.62
, coach
Weight: 0.57
, penalty
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ref
Weight: 0.34
, umpire
Weight: 0.32
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.32
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in football 1.00
be important in football 0.97
be needed in football 0.93
be important in sports game 0.84
throw flags in football games 0.83
be chosen for collage football bowl games 0.80
let hockey players fight 0.79
be in hockey 0.79
be used in sports 0.79
be in game 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(official, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(referee, be in football)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(penalty, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(referee, be in football)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(official, let hockey players fight)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(referee, be in football)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(official, let hockey players fight)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(penalty, be in hockey)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(official, be important in football)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(official, let hockey players fight)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(official, be important in football)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(penalty, be in hockey)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(ref, let hockey players fight)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be in football)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be important in sports game)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(ref, be in game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(official, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(referee, be in football)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(penalty, be in hockey)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(referee, be in football)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(official, let hockey players fight)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(referee, be in football)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(umpire, be in football)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(umpire, be in football)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(umpire, be important in sports game)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(umpire, be important in sports game)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(ref, let hockey players fight)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ref, let hockey players fight)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(ref, be in game)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ref, be in game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(referee, be in football)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(referee, be used in sports)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(referee, be in game)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(referee, be used in sports)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(referee, be in game)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(referee, be needed in football)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(referee, be important in football)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(referee, be important in football)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(referee, be needed in football)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(referee, be needed in football)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(referee, be important in football)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(referee, throw flags in football games)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(referee, be used in sports)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(referee, let hockey players fight)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in hockey)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(referee, be important in football)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(referee, be important in sports game)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(referee, be needed in football)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(referee, be in game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be chosen for collage football bowl games)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(referee, be important in sports game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(referee, be in hockey)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(referee, be important in sports game)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(referee, let hockey players fight)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(referee, throw flags in football games)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(referee, throw flags in football games)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(referee, be in hockey)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(referee, be in hockey)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(referee, let hockey players fight)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(referee, throw flags in football games)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(referee, let hockey players fight)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(referee, be chosen for collage football bowl games)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(referee, be important in sports game)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(referee, be chosen for collage football bowl games)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(referee, be chosen for collage football bowl games)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(referee, be used in sports)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(referee, be in football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(official, let hockey players fight)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(penalty, be in hockey)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(official, be important in football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(ref, be in game)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(umpire, be in football)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ref, let hockey players fight)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(umpire, be important in sports game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(official, let hockey players fight)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(official, be important in football)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(referee, be in football)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(penalty, be in hockey)