umpire: be in football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coach
Weight: 0.48
, man
Weight: 0.47
, official
Weight: 0.45
Siblings referee
Weight: 0.32
, policeman
Weight: 0.31
, young man
Weight: 0.30
, captain
Weight: 0.30
, old man
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in football 1.00
be important in sports game 0.84
be in baseball where 0.82
be selected for baseball games 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(captain, be in football)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(referee, be in football)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(referee, be important in sports game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(referee, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(referee, be in football)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(captain, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(captain, be in football)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(referee, be important in sports game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(referee, be important in sports game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(umpire, be in football)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be important in sports game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(umpire, be in baseball where)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(umpire, be in baseball where)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be in baseball where)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be selected for baseball games)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(umpire, be important in sports game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(umpire, be in baseball where)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(umpire, be important in sports game)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(umpire, be important in sports game)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(umpire, be selected for baseball games)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(umpire, be selected for baseball games)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(umpire, be selected for baseball games)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be in football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(umpire, be in football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(captain, be in football)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(referee, be in football)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(umpire, be in football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(referee, be important in sports game)