referee: has color black

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.62
, coach
Weight: 0.57
, penalty
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ref
Weight: 0.34
, umpire
Weight: 0.32
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.32
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color black 1.00
wear black 0.85
wear white 0.83
wear black stripes 0.82
have black uniforms 0.79
wear black armbands 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, has color black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear black)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(soccer ball, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, has color black)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ref, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(ref, wear black)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(umpire, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear black)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ref, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ref, wear white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, has color black)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, wear black)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, wear white)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(referee, wear white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(referee, wear black stripes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black stripes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(referee, wear white)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(referee, have black uniforms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, have black uniforms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black stripes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, wear black armbands)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black armbands)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(referee, have black uniforms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black armbands)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black stripes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(referee, have black uniforms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black armbands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(referee, has color black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soccer ball, has color black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ref, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(umpire, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ref, wear white)