referee: wear long socks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.62
, coach
Weight: 0.57
, penalty
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ref
Weight: 0.34
, umpire
Weight: 0.32
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.32
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear long socks 1.00
wear socks 0.98
wear white 0.83
wear black 0.82
wear gloves in boxing 0.80
wear on hands 0.79
wear black armbands 0.79
wear armbands 0.79
wear stripes 0.78
rub boxers gloves 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear armbands)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear stripes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ref, wear white)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ref, wear white)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ref, wear black)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(ref, wear black)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(umpire, wear black)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear black)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(umpire, wear armbands)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear armbands)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ref, wear stripes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ref, wear stripes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(referee, wear long socks)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(referee, wear white)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(referee, wear on hands)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, wear white)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(referee, wear gloves in boxing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(referee, wear on hands)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black armbands)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(referee, wear on hands)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, wear black)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(referee, rub boxers gloves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(referee, rub boxers gloves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(referee, wear stripes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(referee, wear white)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(referee, wear gloves in boxing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(referee, rub boxers gloves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, wear black armbands)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(referee, wear stripes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(referee, wear gloves in boxing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black armbands)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(referee, wear stripes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(referee, rub boxers gloves)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear gloves in boxing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black armbands)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear stripes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear on hands)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(referee, wear long socks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ref, wear stripes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(umpire, wear armbands)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ref, wear black)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ref, wear white)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(umpire, wear black)