region: be important in geography

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in geography 1.00
is important geographical tools 0.80
is purely geographical 0.77
be important to human geographers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(region, be important in geography)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(region, is important geographical tools)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(region, is purely geographical)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(region, is purely geographical)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(region, be important to human geographers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(region, is important geographical tools)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(region, is important geographical tools)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(region, is important geographical tools)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(region, be important to human geographers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(region, is purely geographical)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(region, be important to human geographers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(region, is purely geographical)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(region, be important to human geographers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(region, be important in geography)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(region, be important in geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(region, be important in geography)