region: be important to human geographers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to human geographers 1.00
be important to geographers 0.97
be important in geography 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(region, be important to human geographers)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(region, be important to geographers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(region, be important to geographers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(region, be important to geographers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(region, be important to geographers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(region, be important in geography)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(region, be important in geography)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(region, be important in geography)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(region, be important in geography)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(region, be important to human geographers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(region, be important to human geographers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(region, be important to human geographers)