rehabilitation: be associated with positivist school of criminology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.63
, care
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, restoration
Weight: 0.34
, dialysis
Weight: 0.34
, surgery
Weight: 0.33
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be associated with positivist school of criminology 1.00
be associated with school of criminology 0.92
be associated with positivist school 0.92
be associated with school 0.76
be related to science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, be related to science)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(plastic surgery, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with school of criminology)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school of criminology)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school of criminology)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school of criminology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, be related to science)