relation: be with canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, account
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.53
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.61
, identity
Weight: 0.60
, servant
Weight: 0.59
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with canada 1.00
be with canada in russia 0.93
promote change in canada 0.88
were important in australia 0.84
were important in australia between 1901-1914 0.82
was with mexico 0.81
survive in uk england 0.80
was with mexico during 1754 0.79
be in quickbooks 0.78
be throughout zealand 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be with canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be with canada)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(third party, survive in uk england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be with canada)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(account, be in quickbooks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be with canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(account, be in quickbooks)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(third party, survive in uk england)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(factor, promote change in canada)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(factor, promote change in canada)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(third party, survive in uk england)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(account, be in quickbooks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(factor, promote change in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(relation, be with canada)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(relation, be with canada)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(third party, survive in uk england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(relation, be with canada)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(account, be in quickbooks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(relation, be with canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(relation, be with canada)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada in russia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(relation, be with canada in russia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(relation, be with canada in russia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico during 1754)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(relation, be with canada in russia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico during 1754)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico during 1754)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico during 1754)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be with canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(account, be in quickbooks)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(third party, survive in uk england)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(account, be in quickbooks)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(third party, survive in uk england)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(factor, promote change in canada)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be with canada) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(condition, were important in australia between 1901-1914)