relation: was with mexico

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.57 , account Weight: 0.57 , condition Weight: 0.55 , third party Weight: 0.53
Siblings	friendship Weight: 0.61 , identity Weight: 0.60 , servant Weight: 0.59 , attribute Weight: 0.57 , term Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was with mexico	1.00
was with mexico during 1754	0.98
was with mexico difficult	0.94
was with mexico difficult during 1754	0.92
harm mexico	0.89
be with canada in russia	0.82
be with canada	0.81
were in japan different from conditions in germany	0.80
were in germany	0.79
were in germany bad	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(factor, harm mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(factor, harm mexico)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(factor, harm mexico)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(factor, harm mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico during 1754)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico during 1754)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico during 1754)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico during 1754)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(relation, be with canada)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada in russia)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(relation, be with canada)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(relation, be with canada in russia)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(relation, be with canada)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico difficult)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult during 1754)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico difficult)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico difficult during 1754)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(relation, be with canada in russia)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(relation, be with canada in russia)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(relation, was with mexico difficult during 1754)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(relation, was with mexico difficult during 1754)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(relation, was with mexico)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(factor, harm mexico)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(relation, was with mexico) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)