relativity: is difficult

Related concepts

Parents	theory Weight: 0.72 , concept Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.59 , revolution Weight: 0.56 , subject Weight: 0.55
Siblings	quantum physics Weight: 0.36 , big bang theory Weight: 0.34 , string theory Weight: 0.34 , constructivism Weight: 0.34 , quantum mechanics Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is difficult	1.00
is problematic	0.82
is hard	0.82
be like calculus difficult	0.78
be important counselling	0.76
be important to geoligists	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(revolution, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(relativity, is difficult)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(subject, be like calculus difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(relativity, is difficult)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(theory, be important counselling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(relativity, is difficult)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(relativity, is difficult)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(relativity, is difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(revolution, is difficult)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(concept, is hard)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(subject, be like calculus difficult)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(theory, be important counselling)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(revolution, is difficult)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(concept, is hard)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(subject, be like calculus difficult)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important counselling)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(theory, be important to geoligists)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(quantum mechanics, is difficult)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(quantum physics, is hard)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(quantum mechanics, is hard)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(big bang theory, is problematic)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(constructivism, is hard)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(string theory, is hard)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(revolution, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(relativity, is difficult)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(concept, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(relativity, is difficult)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(subject, be like calculus difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(relativity, is difficult)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(theory, be important counselling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(relativity, is difficult)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(theory, be important to geoligists) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(relativity, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(big bang theory, is problematic) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(big bang theory, is problematic)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(constructivism, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(constructivism, is hard)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(string theory, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(string theory, is hard)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(quantum mechanics, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(quantum mechanics, is difficult)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(quantum physics, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(quantum physics, is hard)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(quantum mechanics, is hard) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(quantum mechanics, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Salient(relativity, is difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(relativity, is hard)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(relativity, is hard)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is hard)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(relativity, is hard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.10

Salient(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.07

Plausible(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(relativity, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(revolution, is difficult)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(concept, is hard)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(subject, be like calculus difficult)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(quantum mechanics, is difficult)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(big bang theory, is problematic)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(constructivism, is hard)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(quantum physics, is hard)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(string theory, is hard)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(quantum mechanics, is hard)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(revolution, is difficult)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(concept, is hard)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(subject, be like calculus difficult)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(theory, be important to geoligists)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(relativity, is difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(theory, be important counselling)