rent: be high in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in california 1.00
be expensive in california 0.95
go up in california 0.95
be high in southern california 0.95
be high in massachusetts 0.83
be high in america 0.83
be in denver high 0.82
be high in uk 0.80
be high in seattle 0.80
is high uk 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(rent, be high in california)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rent, be expensive in california)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(rent, go up in california)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rent, be high in southern california)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(rent, go up in california)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rent, be expensive in california)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rent, go up in california)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(rent, be high in southern california)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rent, be expensive in california)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in southern california)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rent, be high in america)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rent, be high in massachusetts)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rent, be in denver high)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(rent, go up in california)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(rent, be in denver high)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rent, be high in america)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rent, be high in uk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rent, be in denver high)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rent, be high in massachusetts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in massachusetts)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rent, be high in uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rent, be expensive in california)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in southern california)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in denver high)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in massachusetts)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in america)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(rent, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rent, be high in california)