rent: be high in seattle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in seattle 1.00
be bad for place like seattle 0.92
be in denver high 0.84
be high in nyc 0.83
be in denver 0.81
be high in london 0.81
be high in toronto 0.81
be high in california 0.80
be high in nashville 0.79
be high in america 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rent, be high in seattle)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(rent, be bad for place like seattle)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(rent, be bad for place like seattle)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(rent, be bad for place like seattle)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(rent, be bad for place like seattle)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(rent, be in denver high)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(rent, be high in nashville)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(rent, be in denver)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rent, be in denver)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rent, be in denver high)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(rent, be in denver)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in nashville)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rent, be in denver high)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in nashville)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rent, be high in nashville)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in denver high)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rent, be high in nyc)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rent, be high in america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rent, be high in london)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in denver)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rent, be high in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rent, be high in nyc)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in nyc)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rent, be high in london)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in london)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rent, be high in america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(rent, be high in california)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in california)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in california)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in nyc)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in london)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rent, be high in seattle)