rent: be high in toronto

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in toronto 1.00
be high in vancouver 0.86
be high in nyc 0.85
be in montreal 0.83
be high in london 0.83
be high in nashville 0.82
be high in seattle 0.81
be in denver high 0.81
be high in america 0.79
be high in uk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rent, be high in toronto)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rent, be in montreal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rent, be in montreal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(rent, be in montreal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(rent, be high in vancouver)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(rent, be high in vancouver)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(rent, be high in nashville)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in vancouver)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in montreal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(rent, be high in nashville)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in nashville)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rent, be high in nyc)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rent, be high in london)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rent, be in denver high)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in nashville)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rent, be high in seattle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(rent, be in denver high)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(rent, be high in america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in vancouver)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rent, be high in uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(rent, be in denver high)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in nyc)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in london)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in seattle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rent, be high in seattle)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rent, be high in nyc)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rent, be high in london)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in denver high)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in uk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rent, be high in america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rent, be high in uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in seattle)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in nyc)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in london)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in uk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rent, be high in toronto)