rent: be in london

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents payment
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.62
, amount
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ground rent
Weight: 0.37
, fee
Weight: 0.34
, allowance
Weight: 0.34
, purchase
Weight: 0.33
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in london 1.00
be high in london 0.96
be in london expensive 0.96
fall in london 0.96
be high in nyc 0.80
be high in toronto 0.78
be in montreal 0.78
be in york city 0.78
be in denver 0.78
be in york city expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(rent, be in london)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(rent, be in london expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rent, be in london expensive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in london expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rent, be in london expensive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rent, fall in london)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rent, be high in london)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rent, fall in london)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(rent, fall in london)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rent, be high in london)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rent, be in montreal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rent, fall in london)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rent, be in montreal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in london)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in montreal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(rent, be in denver)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(rent, be in montreal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in london)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(rent, be in denver)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(rent, be in denver)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in denver)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(rent, be high in toronto)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(rent, be high in nyc)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in toronto)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(rent, be high in toronto)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rent, be high in nyc)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in toronto)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rent, be high in nyc)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rent, be high in nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(rent, be in london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rent, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rent, be in london)