renting: be expensive in uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.49
, home
Weight: 0.44
, area
Weight: 0.36
, real estate
Weight: 0.34
, buying
Weight: 0.31
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.30
, home owner
Weight: 0.30
, pay
Weight: 0.29
, lock
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in uk 1.00
be in denver expensive 0.78
is expensive 0.78
be in seattle expensive 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(renting, be expensive in uk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(renting, be expensive in uk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(home, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(home, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(renting, be expensive in uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(home, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(renting, be expensive in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(renting, be expensive in uk)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(renting, be in denver expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(renting, be in denver expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(renting, be in seattle expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(renting, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(renting, be in seattle expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(renting, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(renting, be in denver expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(renting, be in seattle expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(renting, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(renting, be in denver expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(renting, be in seattle expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(renting, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(renting, be expensive in uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(home, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(renting, be expensive in uk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)