repetition: is rhetorical

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings melody
Weight: 0.33
, randomness
Weight: 0.33
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, rhythm
Weight: 0.33
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rhetorical 1.00
is rhetorical device 0.92
be useful rhetorical device for political speech 0.89
is effective rhetorical device 0.89
be useful rhetorical device for speech 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(repetition, is rhetorical)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is rhetorical)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(repetition, is rhetorical)