repetition: be useful rhetorical device for political speech

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, parameter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings melody
Weight: 0.33
, randomness
Weight: 0.33
, cliche
Weight: 0.33
, rhythm
Weight: 0.33
, characteristic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful rhetorical device for political speech 1.00
be useful rhetorical device for speech 0.98
is rhetorical device 0.93
is effective rhetorical device 0.92
is rhetorical 0.89
be important in speeches 0.78
be effective in speeches 0.78
is literary device 0.78
be used in speeches 0.78
enhance speech 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(repetition, is rhetorical)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(repetition, is rhetorical)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(repetition, is rhetorical)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(repetition, be effective in speeches)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(repetition, be used in speeches)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(repetition, be important in speeches)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(repetition, be used in speeches)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(repetition, is literary device)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(repetition, be effective in speeches)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(repetition, be used in speeches)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(repetition, be effective in speeches)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(repetition, enhance speech)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for speech)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be used in speeches)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(repetition, be important in speeches)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(repetition, enhance speech)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(repetition, is literary device)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(repetition, be important in speeches)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(repetition, enhance speech)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(repetition, is literary device)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be effective in speeches)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is literary device)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be important in speeches)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(repetition, enhance speech)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is effective rhetorical device)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is rhetorical device)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(repetition, is rhetorical)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(repetition, be useful rhetorical device for political speech)